After 100 years of drug prohibition

It's amazing how little has changed when you look at the time and background of our current drug laws.Because hard drugs haven't changed in percentage of population in that 100 years and really are the same as they were before the tax act that began the prohibition.It's hard to see what all the fuss is about?There's also the fact that drugs were kept in the poor areas and amongst the blacks and hispanics until the sixties when all manner of social change split the continent in half.With more than 50% of the people either using or having used drugs it is puzzling that the other half of the population gets their way and the half that uses and to a small extent abuses drugs is persecuted to the point that it's considered alright to do all manner of despicable things to them.Now we once again have a conservative government that loves to tell us how to live and does not hesitate to use force to get it's way.Even though a majority of the public is and has been ready for decriminalization for almost 35 years,this bunch of born again zealots has introduced mandatory minimums even as the US is beginning to see how disastrous this kind of sentence is.The government has apologised for almost every racist action taken in the early 20th century.The one exception is the laws against drug use that were the result of racism and fear of other races.The government never mentions this and always alludes to some non existant cause that demanded that anti drug laws be passed.This is not true and the evidence is all over the web if you have the notion to look it up.Or you can continue to be prejudiced towards a majority of Canadians who just want to live and let live.Prohibition is the most expensive,least effective and most cruel way to not deal with the drug issue.It suits Harper and company just fine.They think that a lie becomes truth if it's repeated often and loudly enough.It's working for them so far because you let it.

When is enforcing the law a criminal enterprise?

When you use the law to steal peoples property when there is virtually no evidence to support the proceeds of crime statute other than that the onus is now on the property owner to prove their innocence.Take the recent case of a reclusive gulf islands resident who's paid for,$600,000 dollar home was seized by the crown for the horrible crime of growing marijuana.Had this man actually been growing for profit he would have been aware of the law and the inherent danger of using his own property for the deed.The man,a 59 year virtual hermit,had been growing pot for his own use for 22 years.He freely admitted this thinking it would be in his favor.If he was a true criminal he would have said nothing and called a lawyer.The crown,in it's zeal to show how B.C. has a zero tolerance policy(unless your an aid to a government minister or a developer with a penchant for hookers and cocaine and the police chief for a friend)chose to take the mans every possession in spite of the obvious doubt that crime had anything to do with this property purchase.Since the passing of this act the Province has stolen 4 million dollars in just under two years.I'm sure a lot of this property was seized justifiably,if you think ownership a crime.If every drug dollar was pulled out of the province tomorrow,half of every new project would fall into the hands of whoever the drug lords chose to offload it on.How much of the recent construction boom do you think is being used to launder criminal proceeds?Not just drug profits but white collar crime prostitution,gambling,protection.Look at the recent activities of this government on the issue of patronage and lobbying.How much illegal money is involved in the ICBC scandal,the Dobel cases,the recent disclosures about the deals in Washington,not to mention Basi-Virk?Why is the only crime that's punishable by the forfeiture of property the drug crimes?It's a known fact that the majority of Canadians want an end to prohibition,especially marijuana prohibition.That's what's in play here.I don't know the man involved.I am only taking the word of him,his lawyers and his neighbors that he almost never has visitors or is even seen.Doesn't sound like a drug dealer to me and I was a drug dealer for almost 35 years.This law is double punishment for a property owner and nothing else.It puts the police in an obvious conflict of interest as the proceeds of the sale of seized property goes to the law enforcement community.What's to stop a police officer that sees something he likes from planting evidence and seizing it then having it purchased in a sweetheart deal for pennies on the dollar?Not possible you say? where have you been for the last 40 years.The drug war has corrupted more police officers than during alcohol prohibition when whole forces were on the mafia payroll.Do you really believe this isn't happening as we speak.We had a police chief working for a major drug ring in the late 50's before drugs exploded onto the scene.Does anyone think things have changed as much as they have with no concurrent corruption?What are you smoking?

Vancouver Police Chief Is lying

Jim Chiu wants people to believe that sending addicts to prison is going to magically transform the city into a bright new future.He is well aware that he is lying.Prison is not a new solution to the drug problem.In fact it is no solution to anything except to warehouse human beings.No-one is claiming that we should close down the prison system and find something better.There are people that are simply too dangerous to allow them to live freely among us.Chiu says he's talked to addicts that have told him that prison saved their lives.He wants us to believe that they meant that they were grateful for federal time.(2 years or more)I have been at this long enough to know exactly what he is referring to.We often say that if it wasn't for all the time we've done we'd probably be dead.This is not a declaration in favor of the federal prison system but a comment on the violence of the addict lifestyle.For Chiu to suggest anything else is dishonest and disingenuous.Prison is a twisted and often brutal place to be and it warps the mind.Sending petty criminals and that is who we're talking about,to prison will only make them more dangerous when they get out.Even Chiu won't say how long he wants the sentence for these "super chronic offenders"(addicts)to be.One only has to look to the south to see what happens when you implement such laws.Prisons fill up and over flow and costs go through the roof.Do we want to have private prisons and long sentences for people who have a disease and steal to feed it?If there was anything new here it might be worth a try,even though it offends the soul.This is something that was done in the past with the result that it was found to be cruel and unusual punishment.I think the police chief knows this.If he doesn't he should look for another job.The Province also tried to have addiction declared a crime and to throw every one in prison for mandatory treatment.When confronted with the facts about the success rates for treatment of hard core addicts they were forced to withdraw the bill.This is a terribly difficult problem and there has,to this date,been no satisfactory solution.That is no reason to go back to imprisoning people for a sickness for long periods of time.It stops them from stealing for the duration of their sentence but it costs a lot of money and makes better criminals out of them.There is also the fact that people who do petty crimes to support their drug habits will turn to more serious crimes if the time they face is the same for both.The chief won't tell you that either and he's well aware of that as well.

dog and pony show losing it's zeal

It used to be that when the police made a major bust of any kind they would drag out all the seized property,run the perp walk,display a table loaded with drugs,money,guns and bundles of cash.They would have some officer with the sternest face in the division give a statement about how this was a _ year investigation costing$-millions of dollars and that it had dealt a major blow to the drug scene and to organized crime.On the street no-one even noticed.Today we saw another low in the dog and pony show era.One tattooed guy with an RCMP entourage went to the airport where they did a one man perp walk and then made the speech with nothing in the way of evidence as he was being deported by their con-air plan to rid the city from as many street people before the Olympics.This was a sad replica of bygone days when they actually solved crimes before they pandered to the public via the media.A few days ago they set up two addicts for murder by making sure the dealers they had just ripped off were aware of who robbed them and when they were being released.When the police do something like this and laugh about how much hurt these guys are in for they have sunk to using the street to attain the justice they are unable to deliver.This is a cowardly act and is no better than hiring a hit man to eliminate someone they dislike.This is just another example of the twisted logic that is the drug war and the total lack of morality or human decency that exists under prohibition.

Cops cry fowl,safe injection site to be judged

Over 500 police representatives from the western hemisphere got together in Vancouver this week to swap stories and scare people.There were all kinds of allegations and very little evidence to back it up but then they were preaching to the converted.There was talk of the terror of Central American gangs and how easy it was for them to cross borders.They wanted one individual locked up on zero evidence and weren't afraid to give the mans name and where he lived.Of course they "knew" this was a really bad guy they just didn't have any of that damn tricky evidence thingy figured out yet.Not to be dissuaded the cops alluded to all manner of horrific crimes that this guy must have committed.They released a whole bunch of figures that showed that they haven't actually done much to put a crimp in gang crime.That wasn't their take but 5 kilos of pot and one of cocaine is not exactly a dent in organized crime.Meanwhile, the feds have released their long awaited report on Insite,Our safe injection site and there is nothing in it that is any thing but positive .Now I guess it's going to be about whether it's positive enough.Tony Clement,our health minister says he'll let them know sometime in the next four months.The only possible reason he could have for denying them their extension now would be personal or dogmatic.Either way,these conservatives have never been shy to let their personal view cloud an issue.We'll know by June 30.